It was still an important product in Apple’s lineup! But well-regarded or not, look at the thermals in the table above. Even after the roundtable meeting, however, Schiller’s “the Mac Mini remains a product in our lineup” comment was taken as a sign that even if Apple had a reinvigorated interest in high-end Mac desktops, the Mac Mini was not a priority.īut then came the very well-regarded 2018 Mac Mini. This gap in Mac desktop hardware was viewed by many as a sign that Apple had lost interest in the Mac.
John Gruber speculates that the difference between the 20 models may explain why there was such a long gap between updates: that Apple had been hoping to switch to its own chip because Intel wasn’t delivering, but was eventually forced to release an interim update.
#Power supply for mac mini 2014 full#
A new M1 Mac Mini running at full speed uses about the same power as a G4 Mac Mini did just sitting there with the Finder open doing nothing. It’s worth noting that the M1 Mac Mini’s maximum power consumption and thermal output are only ever so slightly higher than the idle power/thermal numbers for the original 2005 PowerPC G4 Mac Mini. The numbers from 2014 onward are rather striking. The M1 Mac mini power consumption and thermal output figures highlight just how much more efficient Apple Silicon is than the Intel chips that powered older models …ĭaring Fireball compiled the figures from an Apple Support document.Ī few weeks ago, Apple added the new M1 model to their support page listing the power consumption and thermal output of all Mac Mini models (including the 2005 original, which used a PowerPC G4 CPU).
0 kommentar(er)
